Google is leading the Big Tech legal fight to preserve immigrant spouses’ visas




The tech industry continues to fight to enforce immigration rights for highly skilled workers. Google is leading the latest campaign to preserve a program that allows spouses of H1-B visa holders to work legally in the United States. Nearly 30 companies, including the web giant, Apple, Microsoft, Intel and Twitter, have submitted an amicus brief in support of the H-4 policy in a pending case known as Save Jobs USA v Department of Homeland Security.

A federal court in Washington is expected to rule on the lawsuit challenging the work program in the coming months. A southern California IT worker advocacy group, which claimed it had lost jobs to visa workers, filed a lawsuit in 2015. It was later delayed as President Trump sought to withdraw the rule H-4. However, that did not happen and now the plaintiffs and President Joe Biden’s administration are seeking summary judgment, reports Reuters.

The tech industry has opposite From Trump anti-immigration policies up front, arguing that they would hamper its ability to recruit the talent it needs. Google said in the latest filing that the invalidation of the H-4 rule “would result in the exclusion of these talented people from the workplace, forcibly severing tens of thousands of working relationships across the country.” The H-4 program provides work authorization to over 90,000 H-4 visa holders, over 90% of whom are women.

“As an immigrant myself, I have been the beneficiary of a welcoming America and I hope we can provide the same welcome to future immigrants by preserving the H-4 EAD program. Ending this program would hurt families and undermine the US economy at a critical time. moment, ”said Catherine Lacavera, vice president, legal at Google, in a blog post.

Earlier this month, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) said they would suspend biometric screening requirements for H-4 and L-2 visa holders because they entailed lengthy delays. Reviews Trump-era policy claims it was implemented to create barriers to immigration processing after the administrator failed to revoke the laws.

All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through any of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *